Jonathan Lewis's picture

Sequence Costs

You’re probably aware of the “identity” construct that appeared in 12.1 and uses Oracle’s sequence mechanism to model the Autonumber or Identity columns that other databases have. A posting from Clay Jackson on the Oracle-L list server suggests that something about their code path has introduced a surprising overhead in 19c … when you’re not using them.

The following code is a slightly modified version of a test case that Clay Jackson posted to demonstrate a strange difference in performance between 12.2 and 19.3

Jonathan Lewis's picture


This is a note I drafted in September 2015 and only rediscovered a couple of days ago while searching for something I was sure I’d written about collections and/or table functions. The intention of collections and table functions is that they should behave like tables when you use them in a query – but there are cases where a real table and something cast to a table() aren’t treated the same way by the optimizer – and this 4-year old note (which is still valid in 2020 for 19c) is one of those cases.


Jonathan Lewis's picture

Collection limitation

The ODC SQL and PL/SQL forum came up with an example a couple of days ago that highlighted an annoying limitation in the optimizer’s handling of table functions. The requirement was for a piece of SQL that would generate “installments” information from a table of contract agreements and insert into another table any installments that were not yet recorded there.

The mechanism to turn a single row of contract data into a set of installments was a (optionally pipelined) table function that involved some business logic that (presumably) dealt with the timing and size of the installments. The final SQL to create the data that needed to be inserted was reported as follows (though it had clearly been somewhat modified):

Jonathan Lewis's picture

Purge Cursor

This is a note I first drafted about 5 years ago (the date stamp says March 2014) and rediscovered a few days ago when the question came up on a Twitter thread.

How do you purge a single SQL statement from the library cache without having to execute “alter system flush shared_pool”?

Jonathan Lewis's picture

Wait for Java

This is a note courtesy of Jack can Zanen on the Oracle-L list server who asked a question about “wait for CPU” and then produced the answer a couple of days later. It’s a simple demonstration of how Java in the database can be very deceptive in terms of indicating CPU usage that isn’t really CPU usage.

Bottom line – when you call Java Oracle knows you’re about to start doing some work on the CPU, but once you’re inside the java engine Oracle has no way of knowing whether the java code is on the CPU or waiting. So if the java starts to wait (e.g. for some slow file I/O) Oracle will still be reporting your session as using CPU.

To demonstrate the principle, I’m going to create little java procedure that simply goes to sleep – and see what I find in the active session history (ASH) after I’ve been sleeping in java for 10 seconds.

Jonathan Lewis's picture


Here’s a worrying bug that showed up a couple of days ago on the Oracle-L mailing list. It’s a problem that I’ve tested against and – it may be present on earlier versions of Oracle. One of the nastiest things about it is that you might not notice it until you get an “out of space” error from the operating system. You won’t get any wrong results from it, but it may well be adding an undesirable performance overhead.

Jonathan Lewis's picture

Temp space

A question about hunting down the source of the error “ORA-01652 unable to extend temp segment by NNN in tablespace XXX” shows up on the Oracle-L mailing list or the Oracle developer community forum from time to time. In most cases the tablespace referenced is the temporary tablespace, which means the session reporting the error was probably trying to allocate some space for sorting, or doing a hash join, or instantiating a GTT (global temporary table) or a CTE (common table expression / “with” subquery). The difficulty in cases like this is that the session reporting the error might be the victim of some other session’s greed – so looking at what the session was doing won’t necessarily point you to the real problem.

Jonathan Lewis's picture

Parse Time

This is a note I started drafting In October 2012. It’s a case study from an optimizer (10053) trace file someone emailed to me, and it describes some of the high-level steps I went through to see if I could pinpoint what the optimizer was doing that fooled it into spending a huge amount of time optimising a statement that ultimately executed very quickly.

Unfortunately I never finished my notes and I can no longer find the trace file that the article was based on, so I don’t really know what I was planning to say to complete the last observation I had recorded.

Jonathan Lewis's picture

Library Cache Stats

In resonse to a comment that one of my notes references a call to a packate “snap_libcache”, I’ve posted this version of SQL that can be run by SYS to create the package, with a public synonym, and privileges granted to public to execute it. The package doesn’t report the DLM (RAC) related activity, and is suitable only for 11g onwards (older versions require a massive decode of an index value to convert indx numbers into names).

jeremy.schneider's picture

PostgreSQL Invalid Page and Checksum Verification Failed

At the Seattle PostgreSQL User Group meetup this past Tuesday, we got onto the topic of invalid pages in PostgreSQL. It was a fun discussion and it made me realize that it’d be worth writing down a bunch of the stuff we talked about – it might be interesting to a few more people too!

Invalid Page In Block

You see an error message that looks like this:

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Syndicate content